3 Ne 3:1-10 Lachoneus…received an epistle from the leader…of this band
of robbers
Hugh Nibley
“A
letter from the leader of the society to the governor of the Nephite land gives
remarkable insight into their psychology. The chief who signs himself the governor
of the Society (3 Nephi 3:9) begins by expressing warm admiration for the
Nephite governor's firmness ‘in maintaining that
which ye suppose to be your right and liberty’ (3 Nephi 3:2), showing
himself to be a fair-minded and sporting type. In the next verse he is very
patronizing—every inch the ‘big-shot.’ ‘And it
seemeth a pity unto me, most noble Lachoneus, that ye should be so foolish and
vain as to suppose that ye can stand against so many brave men who are at my
command’ (3 Nephi 3:3). So, big hearted as he is, the chief proposes a
deal, but not until he has first given a little sermon which burns with
righteous indignation for the wrongs he and his people have suffered (3 Nephi
3:4). The deal is that Lachoneus, for whose genuine talent and courage the
chief again expresses his sincere admiration, is to be taken into the Society,
and in return for bringing with him all the property over which his authority
extends, he is to be received on a 50-50 basis—‘not
our slaves, but our brethren and partners of all our substance’ (3 Nephi
3:6-7). It was all very high-minded and idealistic. The chief was speaking only
in the name of virtue; he was simply giving the other side a break, ‘feeling for your welfare,’ as he so nicely put it
(3 Nephi 3:5). If the deal was refused, it would be curtains [‘mob talk’]; ‘ye shall become extinct’ (3 Nephi 3:8). All he is
asking for, Giddianhi concludes, is ‘that this my
people may recover their rights and government, who have dissented away
from you because of your wickedness in retaining from them their rights of
government’ (3 Nephi 3:10; italics added). And let no one suppose that
his followers did not sincerely believe that they were the righteous and
offended ones, and their opponents just too wicked to live with.” (An
Approach To The Book of Mormon, p. 391)
3 Ne 3:19 custom…to appoint for their chief captains…some one that
had the spirit of revelation and also prophecy
Only in Mormon’s book of
military history is the quality of spirituality greater than any other. Who
would suppose that the spirit of revelation and prophecy are more important for
a military leader than experience, organizational skills, and thoughtful
strategy? Yet, the Nephites knew who was the source of their success save it were in their times of wickedness.
Consider the advantage of
having a captain like Zoram who could commune with the Lord through the prophet
Alma to find out the location of the enemy (Alma 16:5-6). Imagine a chief
captain like Moroni who consistently put down internal dissension because he
understood that the inner vessel must be cleansed first (Alma 46; 50:33;
51:13-19; 62:1-9). He even received direct revelation from the Lord regarding
the propriety of this bloody internal cleansing (Alma 60:33). Add to this the
many, many times in which the strategy of the Nephites was inspired by the
Spirit of the Lord. Then consider how these great captain-prophets would even
call the people to repentance if needed (Mormon 3:2-3). In view of the many
Nephite victories claimed against incredible odds, it is apparent that their
custom of appointing spiritual chief captains was a militarily sound one. These
great military leaders fought according to Nephi’s motto: O Lord, I have
trusted in thee, and I will trust in thee forever. I will not put my trust in
the arm of flesh; for I know that cursed is he that putteth his trust in the
arm of flesh. Yea, cursed is he that putteth his trust in man or maketh flesh
his arm (2 Ne 4:34).
3 Ne 3:21 The Lord forbid; for if we should go up against them the
Lord would deliver us into their hands
“Although
the Gadianton Robbers had threatened to come to battle against the Nephites ‘on the morrow month,’ when the Nephites asked
their military leader Gidgiddoni to attack the robbers first, Gidgiddoni said: ‘The Lord forbid; for if we should go up against them the
Lord would deliver us into their hands.’ (3 Nephi 3:21.) This counsel of
the Lord not to wage offensive war has apparently been given to people of all
dispensations, as is indicated in this statement in the Doctrine and Covenants:
‘Behold, this is the law I gave unto my servant Nephi, and thy fathers,
Joseph, and Jacob, and Isaac, and Abraham, and all mine ancient prophets and
apostles.
And again, this is the law that I gave unto mine ancients, that they
should not go out unto battle against any nation, kindred, tongue, or people,
save I, the Lord, commanded them.
And if any nation, tongue, or people should proclaim war against them,
they should first lift a standard of peace unto that people, nation, or tongue;
And if that people did not accept the offering of peace, neither the
second nor the third time, they should bring these testimonies before the Lord;
Then I, the Lord, would give unto them a commandment, and justify them
in going out to battle against that nation, tongue, or people.
And I, the Lord, would fight their battles, and their children's
battles, and their children's children's, until they had avenged themselves on
all their enemies, to the third and fourth generation.
Behold, this is an ensample unto all people, saith the Lord your God,
for justification before me.’ (D&C
98:32-38.)
“This
principle is also the teaching of the Church at this time, as is indicated in
the following statement by President George Q. Cannon:
‘We must proclaim peace; do all in our power to
appease the wrath of our enemies; make any sacrifice that honorable people can
to avert war, with all its horrors, entailing as it does dreadful consequences
so numerous that they cannot be mentioned. It is our duty, I say, as a nation.
The influence of the Latter-day Saints should be used in this direction. We
should seek to quell these feelings of anxiety to fight and to shed blood. Our
influence should go forth like oil poured upon the troubled waters, quieting
the waves of discontent and wrath that are aroused by this fearful spirit. ...
‘Not only ought we to extend the offering of peace
the first time to a nation that proclaims war against us, but again the second
time; and if that should be rejected, again the third time; and if it be
rejected the third time, then: They should bring
these testimonies before the Lord.
‘Go to the Lord and say, ‘Here are our testimonies.
We have offered peace the first time; we have offered it twice; we have offered
it three times; but our offerings are rejected, and this nation is determined
to have war with us. Now we bring these testimonies before thee, Lord.’ ...
‘I do not look for our nation to do this. It is
scarcely to be expected, in the nature of things, that they would do it. But it
is the true principle, and we as a people should use our influence for this
purpose. Our prayers should ascend to God; our petitions should ascend to the
government of our nation to do everything that honorable people can to avert
war. We have no fear of the effect of the combinations against us. ... But the
promise of God is that if we will do right as a nation, if we will serve Him,
they shall not have power over us, or be able to bring us into bondage; and in
the end we shall prevail. This is a glorious promise which is made to the
inhabitants of the land. ...
‘To us as Latter-day Saints these principles are of
the utmost importance. I do not want to see our young men get filled with the
spirit of war and be eager for the conflict. God forbid that such a spirit
should prevail in our land, or that we should contribute in any manner to the
propagation of a spirit of that kind! But one may say, ‘Is it not our duty to
defend our country and our flag? Is it not our duty to maintain the
institutions which the Lord has given to us?’ Certainly it is. And it is no
part of cowardice to take the plan that the Lord has pointed out. No man need
be afraid that the Lord or any just man will look upon him as a coward.’ (Conference
Report, April 1898, pp. 86-87.)
“The principle behind this counsel apparently is
related to the principle of repentance, as is indicated in this statement by President
Joseph Fielding Smith:
‘The
law of forgiveness and retribution ... applies to individuals and to families,
as well as to the Church at large. We are under commandment to forgive our
enemies and suffer their abuses and smiting the first time and second time,
also the third time. This is to be done in patience, and in humility and prayer,
hoping that the enemy might repent. If the enemy come upon us for the fourth
time we are justified in meting out retribution, but even then there is to come
a reward if we patiently endure, and the Lord will reward us abundantly. For
all these abuses we will be rewarded if we endure them in patience. Perchance
the enemy may repent, and that we should most sincerely desire. This may to the
most ordinary human being be a hard law to follow; but nevertheless it is the
word of the Lord. One of the best illustrations of this spirit of enduring
wrong rather than retaliating is found in the story of the people of Ammon in
the Book of Mormon. Because they refused to take up arms to defend themselves,
but would rather lay down their lives than shed blood even in their own
defense, they brought many of their enemies to repentance and to the kingdom of
God. [Alma 24:17-25; 27:3.] This is the doctrine of Jesus Christ as taught in
the Sermon on the Mount. [Matt. 5:21-22, 43-44.] If all peoples would accept
this doctrine there could be no war, and all difficulties could be adjusted in
righteousness. This doctrine was taught, so the Lord declared, to his people
anciently. There are many things in the Old Testament in relation to the wars
and battles of the Israelites in the meagre record which has come down to us,
which are made to appear to us that these people were cruel and vengeful, but
the Lord says they went out to battle when they were guided by prophets and the
spirit of revelation when the Lord commanded them. (Joseph Fielding Smith, Church
History and Modern Revelation [Salt Lake City: The Council of the Twelve
Apostles, 1953], 1:434-35.)” (Daniel Ludlow, A Companion to Your Study of the Book of
Mormon, p. 254-6)